![]() Then the blast blew the broken bodies at 500 to 1,000 miles per hour through the flaming, rubble-filled air. The piece read: “In the following waves people’s bodies were terribly squeezed, then their internal organs ruptured. LIFE magazine described such devastation in an article published on March 11, 1946, on the aftermath of the atomic bombs dropped on Japan. Blasts from both bombs would also instantly burn wood structures to the ground, topple big buildings and render roads unusable. What are the similarities between hydrogen bombs and atomic bombs?īoth bombs are extremely lethal and have the power to kill people within seconds, as well as hours later due to radiation. Hydrogen bombs are also harder to produce but lighter in weight, meaning they could travel farther on top of a missile, according to experts. “Those were small bombs, and they were bad enough.” Hydrogen bombs, he said, would result in a yield of about 100,000 kilotons of TNT, up to several million kilotons of TNT, which would mean more deaths. “Those were the little guys,” Morse said. Morse said the atomic bombs dropped on Japan were each equivalent to just about 10,000 kilotons of TNT. “The extra yield is going to give you more bang,” Morse said. However, more energy is released during the fusion process, which causes a bigger blast. In both cases, a significant amount of energy is released, which drives the explosion, experts say. “The way the hydrogen bomb works - it’s really a combination of fission and fusion together,” said Eric Norman, who also teaches nuclear engineering at UC Berkeley. “A regular atomic bomb would still be devastating, but it would not do nearly as much damage as an H-bomb.” “It will basically wipe out any of modern cities,” Hall said. Hall, director of the University of Tennessee’s Institute for Nuclear Security, called the hydrogen bomb a “city killer” that would probably annihilate between 100 and 1,000 times more people than an atomic bomb. “In other words, you kill more people,” he said. “With the bomb we dropped in Nagasaki, it killed everybody within a mile radius,” Morse told TIME on Friday, adding that a hydrogen bomb’s reach would be closer to 5 or 10 miles. Hydrogen bombs cause a bigger explosion, which means the shock waves, blast, heat and radiation all have larger reach than an atomic bomb, according to Edward Morse, a professor of nuclear engineering at University of California, Berkeley.Īlthough no other country has used such a weapon of mass destruction since World War II, experts say it would be even more catastrophic if a hydrogen bomb were to be dropped instead of an atomic one. witnessed the magnitude of a hydrogen bomb when it tested one within the country in 1954, the New York Times reported. The bombings in the two cities were so devastating, they forced Japan to surrender.īut a hydrogen bomb has the potential to be 1,000 times more powerful than an atomic bomb, according to several nuclear experts. dropped the world’s first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and then another one three days later in Nagasaki during World War II in 1945, according to the Associated Press. More than 200,000 people died in Japan after the U.S. As global tensions continue to rise over North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, here’s what to know about atomic and hydrogen bombs: Why is a hydrogen bomb stronger than an atomic bomb?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |